Philosophical Enquiries, n°7, décembre 2016
jeudi 15 décembre 2016,
In his discussion of scepticism, Reid often appeals to “original principles of belief” and “principles of common sense”. He also refers to “first principles of truth” and more simply to “common sense”. The terminology does not seem clearly fixed. Is it all the same ? If not, shall we accuse him of a lack of coherence ? My contention is that common sense is a power of knowledge and first principles are propositions taken for granted. The dispelling of this ambiguity sheds a new light on Reid’s position on the epistemic scene. Indeed, these two readings (the “faculty-line-of-thought” and the “basic propositions-line-of-thought”) correspond to Reid’s different targets : while he sometimes considers the sceptical attitude, aiming at dissolving it, at other moments he is rather involved in the discussion of sceptical arguments, striving to raise an objection to them. Finally, I claim that the question to know whether principles of common sense are natural psychological tendencies or rather first truths, on which the structure of knowledge is erected, is not adequate. If we usually separate these two threads, Reid’s epistemic finalism (according to which, by the original constitution of our nature, we are designed to truth) quite naturally weaves them. I propose a third line of thought, drawing from Wittgenstein’s remarks on “hinge propositions”.
Maître de conférence. Philosophie britannique moderne, philosophie écossaise du sens commun, philosophie de la connaissance et philosophie de l’esprit.
Courrier électronique : Angélique Thébert
Sous la direction de Rebecca Copenhaver (Lewis & Clark College) et Todd Buras (Baylor University)
Oxford University Press
Dossier sur Locke
n°3 de la revue Philosophical Enquiries
Matérialisme et nécessitarisme au XVIIIe siècle
Revue Dix-huitième Siècle, 26, 2014, ,
Philosophical Enquiries, numéro 1, juin 2013
Une solution reidienne au problème du critère
Igitur, Vol. 4, n°1, p. 1-25