Accueil  Publications  Belief Fragments and Mental Files

In Cristina Borgoni, Dirk Kindermann, Andrea Onofri (eds.) « The Fragmented Mind »

Belief Fragments and Mental Files

Oxford University Press, 2021.

lundi 6 septembre 2021, Michael Murez

Abstract : Belief fragments and mental files are based on the same idea : that information in people’s minds is compartmentalized rather than lumped all together. While some authors (Cherniak 1986 ; Egan 2008) occasionally describe fragments as ‘mental files,’ philosophers mostly use the two notions differently, though the exact relationship between fragments and files has yet to be examined in detail. This chapter has three main goals. The first is to argue that fragments and files, properly understood, play distinct yet complementary explanatory roles ; the second is to defend a model of belief that includes them both ; and the third is to raise and address a shared dilemma that confronts them : They threaten to be either explanatorily lightweight or empirically refuted.


À propos de l'auteur :

Maître de conférences.
Philosophie de l’esprit. Philosophie du langage.

Courrier électronique : Michael Murez

Du même auteur :
  • In J. Smortchkova, K. Dołęga, & Tobias Schlicht (eds.) « What Are Mental Representations ? » Oxford University Press, 2020.

    Representational Kinds

    avec J. Smortchkova

    Michael Murez
    Abstract : Many debates in philosophy focus on whether folk or scientific psychological notions pick out cognitive natural kinds. Examples include memory, emotions and concepts. A potentially interesting kind of kind is : kinds of mental representations (as opposed, for example, to kinds of psychological faculties). In this chapter we outline a proposal for a theory of representational kinds in cognitive science. We argue that the explanatory role of representational kinds in scientific (...)

  • Les Études philosophiques 2019/3 (N°193)

    Le fressellianisme face au dilemme de l’accointance

    In S. Gandon & D. Perrin (eds.) « Renouveaux de la notion russellienne d’acquaintance »

    Michael Murez
    Selon le russellianisme, nous avons des pensées singulières faisant directement référence aux objets, fondées sur des relations d’accointance (1re partie). Selon le frégéanisme, toute pensée est médiatisée par un concept (2e partie). Le fressellianisme anti-descriptiviste cherche à réconcilier ces thèses apparemment opposées, et à éviter les objections auxquelles chacune s’expose, en postulant des concepts singuliers, individués par des relations d’accointance (3e partie). Mais le fressellianisme rencontre (...)

  • Synthese 2019

    Hearing meanings : the revenge of context

    avec Luca Gasparri

    Michael Murez
    According to the perceptual view of language comprehension, listeners typically recover high-level linguistic properties such as utterance meaning without inferential work. The perceptual view is subject to the Objection from Context : since utterance meaning is massively context-sensitive, and context-sensitivity requires cognitive inference, the perceptual view is false. In recent work, Berit Brogaard provides a challenging reply to this objection. She argues that in language comprehension (...)

Haut de page up

rechercher sur le caphi

aide & repérage

logouniv       Le site du CAPHI est mis à disposition selon les termes de la licence Creative Commons Paternité - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 2.0 France.      Creative Commons